Even more great feedback and now there is a third draft to look at. I think this might be the final one.
Following some great feedback, I have produced the following 2nd draft. The comments I got included:
“…leave out the reference to the HEA PI, unless it suits the purpose of the other conference. The poster should represent your research and I don’t think you need anything which either supports the idea that it is practitioner research or is of a high quality. That should come through the poster…”
“I would put up front and in very big text a summary of the topic and findings (summary instead of introduction). Then around it you put further details on different aspects…” among other pertinent comments. Thank you to all my generous critical readers.